LOL this place is SO full of shit

this is a note I get:

Bubblicious-1,

Your deviation, listed below, has been made temporarily unavailable from deviantART due to it containing nudity or a model of questionable age, and therefore we require a Model Release Form:

URL: [link]
Title: Inf.Animation 22 +BE
Submitted: 2009-02-09 3:45:29 pm

Now, I used stock from deviant art.. the original piece has been allowed to stay up..so I write this:

I submitted a deviation from stock provided by deviant art and it was removed because of a "model of questionable age" which is rediculous, YOU provided the stock!! the stock is erieye-stock :iconerieeye-stock:
the perpetual harassment from this site over the work I submit is getting ridiculous. If my picture is removed, then I want the ORIGINAL picture removed and ALL the deviations that used her stock as well. Do I need to go through all of them and report them and see what gets removed, or is it just because someone has an issue with what I do? this is just beyond wrong.


so NOW their reason for removing was:

Stock resources are not offered or provided by deviantART itself; they are offered and provided by individual artists and photographers.

As far as your work is concerned, the stock provider lists a condition of, "Do not use my stock to demean, humiliate or insult my models" and a requirement to contact them personally to view your final product.

Since inflation fetish art is quite often deemed "demeaning", "humiliating", or "insulting" when it involves modification of photographs of actual models the reviewing staff member deemed it necessary to confirm that your finished work met the stock provider's terms of use.


so they lied originially?And just made up and excuse? come on!

If its the VERY LAST THING I DO HERE ON DEVIANT ART Im going to submit so many inflation pictures that they cant remove, because there are a few stock artists here that ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE CREATIVE!!!! I find it pathetic that artists actually JUDGE what is art and what isnt on here... who gave anyone the right to deem what is art and what isnt? Im forced everyday to see images of Naruto (which is a copywrited image) under the guise of "fan art" so Im forced to see Naruto in homosexual positions with other anime characters.. I wonder if the creators of Naruto would allow the usage of their characters in this way? or DISNEY even!! I have a good mind to contact these companies and let them know they are allowd to even SELL these images.. but my lil ol gif of a girls boobs getting bigger they remove because they dont want to OFFEND AN ANONYMOUS PERSON!

can you tell im annoyed